As the Commission noted in its 1995 study of performance-based budgeting, some things in government programs are easy to measure: how many pieces of paper are processed, how long it takes, how much money it costs. Other things are more difficult to quantify: the impact of a recommendation, the degree to which a study stimulates discussion and leads to change, the number of people reached and educated by a report. Results are often best measured by looking at a combination of:

This section summarizes the easy-to-measure inputs and outputs for the Commission in 1995 and 1996, as well as highlighting some "outcome" indicators.

Inputs: The Commission operates with a staff of six and a budget of under $700,000. Its process is specifically designed to augment these limited resources with experts, who generously donate their time and services.

To illustrate this leveraging process, during 1995 and 1996 the Commission hosted meetings for a half dozen advisory committees ranging in size from 45 to 140, often involving more than 40 hours of discussion for each study topic. The Commission also conducted 18 days of public hearings for various studies, providing a platform for more than 100 expert witnesses.

For instance, for its Public Utilities Commission study, the Commission had two separate advisory groups, each with more than 50 members, hosted more than a dozen half-day meetings, and conducted five days of public hearings with 45 witnesses. For its land-use study, more than 100 experts were interviewed. The charter school study involved site visits to 26 of the 80 charter schools then in existence.

Outputs: The Commission's main "products" are in-depth, well-documented reports. The Commission produced 13 reports in 1995 and 1996 (please see Appendix B for a listing of all Commission reports since 1962).

In addition, the Commission sponsored or supported 97 bills during the two-year legislative session. These are detailed in the section on legislation.

Outcomes: When the Commission sees its recommendations implemented through legislation, it is relatively easy to link the Commission's effort to a result. But perhaps the most difficult impact to quantify is the Commission's success in promoting change. Often the Commission's activities serve as a stimulus for dialogue, incremental change or further review of problems by other bodies. Examples abound in the past two years:








Next Section   Previous Section   Table of Contents